This blog is highly personal, makes no attempt at being politically correct, will occasionaly offend your sensibility, and certainly does not represent the opinions of the people I work with or for.
The future of software, the end of apps, and why UX designers should care about type theory
avatar

Some times ago I came across the following: The future of software, the end of apps, and why UX designers should care about type theory. I loved it very much. I felt like this guy managed to express thoughts I have not had yet but would have had at some point in the future...

Small extract below.

Though the machine metaphor is wrong for software, it's also understandable why it's persisted. Before the discovery of software, arguably in the 1930s with Alan Turing's invention of the universal Turing machine, human technology had produced only physical artifacts like cash registers, engines, and light bulbs, built for some particular purpose and equipped with a largely fixed vocabulary of actions. With software came the idea that behavior and functionality could be specified as pure information, independent of the machine which interprets them. This raised novel possibilities. As pure information, a program is infinitely copyable at near zero cost, and in the internet age, capable of being transported anywhere on the planet almost instantaneously. A programmer can now miraculously turn thoughts to reality and deploy them around the globe by typing on a keyboard and clicking a few buttons. Though our mindset hasn't caught up yet, software relegated the machine (which once held primacy for the artifacts and technology produced by civilization) to an implementation detail, a substrate for the real technology--the specification of behavior in the form of a program.

[ add a comment ]

Archives